↓ Skip to main content

Personally perceived publication pressure: revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) by using work stress models

Overview of attention for article published in Research Integrity and Peer Review, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
30 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Personally perceived publication pressure: revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) by using work stress models
Published in
Research Integrity and Peer Review, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41073-019-0066-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamarinde L. Haven, Marije Esther Evalien de Goede, Joeri K. Tijdink, Frans Jeroen Oort

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Master 7 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 19%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Other 14 33%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,151,020
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#54
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,555
of 366,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.