↓ Skip to main content

A comparison between whole transcript and 3’ RNA sequencing methods using Kapa and Lexogen library preparation methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison between whole transcript and 3’ RNA sequencing methods using Kapa and Lexogen library preparation methods
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12864-018-5393-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feiyang Ma, Brie K. Fuqua, Yehudit Hasin, Clara Yukhtman, Chris D. Vulpe, Aldons J. Lusis, Matteo Pellegrini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 195 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 42 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#16,799,508
of 20,850,533 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,711
of 10,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,896
of 288,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,850,533 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.