You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Policies to clean up toxic industrial contaminated sites of Gela and Priolo: a cost-benefit analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Health, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-10-68 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carla Guerriero, Fabrizio Bianchi, John Cairns, Liliana Cori |
Abstract |
Cost-benefit analysis is a transparent tool to inform policy makers about the potential effect of regulatory interventions, nevertheless its use to evaluate clean-up interventions in polluted industrial sites is limited. The two industrial areas of Gela and Priolo in Italy were declared "at high risk of environmental crisis" in 1990. Since then little has been done to clean the polluted sites and reduce the health outcomes attributable to pollution exposure. This study, aims to quantify the monetary benefits resulting from clean-up interventions in the contaminated sites of Gela and Priolo. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 8 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 20% |
Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 8 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,345,261
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#631
of 1,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,350
of 121,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.