You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Defining and measuring quality in acute paediatric trauma stabilisation: a phenomenographic study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advances in Simulation, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41077-019-0091-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ralph James MacKinnon, Karin Pukk-Härenstam, Ulrica Von Thiele Schwarz, Christopher Kennedy, Terese Stenfors |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
Australia | 3 | 14% |
United States | 3 | 14% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Sweden | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 33% |
Members of the public | 7 | 33% |
Scientists | 6 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 33% |
Professor | 4 | 17% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Psychology | 2 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 21% |
Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,774,508
of 24,880,704 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#81
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,669
of 359,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,880,704 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.