↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of high intensity intermittent training on metabolic, reproductive and mental health in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: study protocol for the iHIT- randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of high intensity intermittent training on metabolic, reproductive and mental health in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: study protocol for the iHIT- randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3313-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle Hiam, Rhiannon Patten, Melanie Gibson-Helm, Alba Moreno-Asso, Luke McIlvenna, Itamar Levinger, Cheryce Harrison, Lisa J Moran, Anju Joham, Alex Parker, Soulmaz Shorakae, David Simar, Nigel Stepto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 297 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 15%
Student > Master 31 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 126 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 14%
Sports and Recreations 28 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 139 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,482,286
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#774
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,387
of 350,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them