↓ Skip to main content

The expression of genes coding for distinct types of glycine-rich proteins varies according to the biology of three metastriate ticks, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, Rhipicephalus sanguineus…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The expression of genes coding for distinct types of glycine-rich proteins varies according to the biology of three metastriate ticks, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Amblyomma cajennense
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-363
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra R Maruyama, Elen Anatriello, Jennifer M Anderson, José M Ribeiro, Lucinda G Brandão, Jesus G Valenzuela, Beatriz R Ferreira, Gustavo R Garcia, Matias PJ Szabó, Sonal Patel, Richard Bishop, Isabel KF de Miranda-Santos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 39%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,230,052
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,429
of 10,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,296
of 96,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#13
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,658 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.