You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the effect of implementation and context on a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial of a vital sign triage device in routine maternity care in low-resource settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0885-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola Vousden, Elodie Lawley, Paul T. Seed, Muchabayiwa Francis Gidiri, Umesh Charantimath, Grace Makonyola, Adrian Brown, Lomi Yadeta, Rebecca Best, Sebastian Chinkoyo, Bellington Vwalika, Annettee Nakimuli, James Ditai, Grace Greene, Lucy C. Chappell, Jane Sandall, Andrew H. Shennan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 63% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 21% |
| Scientists | 5 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 75 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 82 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,224,812
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#491
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,618
of 350,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#18
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.