You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The concept of vulnerability in medical ethics and philosophy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joachim Boldt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 56 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 22% |
| Unknown | 55 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#16,025,167
of 25,342,911 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#185
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,280
of 360,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,342,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.