↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with utilization of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods among married women of reproductive age in Mekelle town, Tigray region, north Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
463 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with utilization of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods among married women of reproductive age in Mekelle town, Tigray region, north Ethiopia
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-12-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mussie Alemayehu, Tefera Belachew, Tizta Tilahun

Abstract

Ethiopia is the second most populous country in Sub-Saharan Africa. Total Fertility Rate of Ethiopia is 5.4 children per women, population growth rate is estimated to be 2.7% per year and contraceptive prevalence rate is only 15% while the unmet need for family planning is 34%. Overall awareness of Family Planning methods is high, at 87%. The prevalence of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods (LAPMs) in Tigray region was very low which accounts for 0.1% for implants and no users for intra-uterine contraceptive device (IUCD) and female sterilization. Moreover almost all modern contraceptive use in Ethiopia is dependent on short acting contraceptive methods. The objective of this study was to assess factors associated with utilization of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods (LAPM) among married women of reproductive age group in Mekelle town.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 458 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 125 27%
Student > Bachelor 49 11%
Student > Postgraduate 31 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 6%
Researcher 27 6%
Other 61 13%
Unknown 142 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 93 20%
Social Sciences 39 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Arts and Humanities 10 2%
Other 40 9%
Unknown 153 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2012.
All research outputs
#14,724,504
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,833
of 4,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,012
of 246,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.