You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
International Analgesia, Sedation, and Delirium Practices: a prospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-019-0379-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gary D. Owen, Joanna L. Stollings, Shayan Rakhit, Li Wang, Chang Yu, Morgan A. Hosay, James W. Stewart, Fernando Frutos-Vivar, Oscar Peñuelas, Andres Esteban, Antonio R. Anzueto, Konstantinos Raymondos, Fernando Rios, Arnaud W. Thille, Marco González, Bin Du, Salvatore M. Maggiore, Dimitrios Matamis, Fekri Abroug, Pravin Amin, Amine Ali Zeggwagh, Mayur B. Patel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 14 | 34% |
Argentina | 2 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 24 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 34 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 25% |
Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 19% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 20 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,437,512
of 25,709,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#68
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,788
of 364,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,709,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.