↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of routinely collected anthropometric measurements in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of routinely collected anthropometric measurements in primary care
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0726-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Carsley, Patricia C. Parkin, Karen Tu, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Nav Persaud, Jonathon L. Maguire, Catherine S. Birken

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Lecturer 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 37 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 42 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,124,181
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#483
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,833
of 350,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#21
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.