↓ Skip to main content

Using transcriptomics to identify and validate novel biomarkers of human skeletal muscle cancer cachexia

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using transcriptomics to identify and validate novel biomarkers of human skeletal muscle cancer cachexia
Published in
Genome Medicine, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/gm122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan A Stephens, Iain J Gallagher, Olav Rooyackers, Richard J Skipworth, Ben H Tan, Troels Marstrand, James A Ross, Denis C Guttridge, Lars Lundell, Kenneth C Fearon, James A Timmons

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Montenegro 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Professor 14 9%
Other 40 26%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 32 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#16,579,551
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,427
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,996
of 183,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.