You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0883-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin Brown, Wouter T. Gude, Thomas Blakeman, Sabine N. van der Veer, Noah Ivers, Jill J. Francis, Fabiana Lorencatto, Justin Presseau, Niels Peek, Gavin Daker-White |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 27% |
| United States | 11 | 17% |
| Canada | 8 | 12% |
| Australia | 6 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 47% |
| Scientists | 25 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 333 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 16% |
| Unknown | 120 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 13% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 56 | 17% |
| Unknown | 139 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,102,578
of 25,965,655 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#166
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,453
of 366,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,965,655 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.