↓ Skip to main content

Burnout syndrome among dental students: a short version of the "Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire" adapted for students (BCSQ-12-SS)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Burnout syndrome among dental students: a short version of the "Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire" adapted for students (BCSQ-12-SS)
Published in
BMC Medical Education, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-11-103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesus Montero-Marin, Francesca Monticelli, Marina Casas, Amparo Roman, Inmaculada Tomas, Margarita Gili, Javier Garcia-Campayo

Abstract

Burnout has been traditionally defined in relation to the dimensions of "exhaustion", "cynicism", and "inefficiency". More recently, the Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire (BCSQ-12) further established three different subtypes of burnout: the "frenetic" subtype (related to "overload"), the "under-challenged" subtype (related to "lack of development"), and the "worn-out" subtype (related to "neglect"). However, to date, these definitions have not been applied to students. The aims of this research were (1) to adapt a Spanish version of the BCSQ-12 for use with students, (2) to test its factorial validity, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and (3) to assess potential socio-demographic and occupational risk factors associated with the development of the subtypes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 20%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 38%
Psychology 23 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 33 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2012.
All research outputs
#2,017,012
of 3,628,597 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#454
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,899
of 230,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,597 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.