↓ Skip to main content

Mitochondrial D-loop sequence variation among Italian horse breeds

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mitochondrial D-loop sequence variation among Italian horse breeds
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, January 2004
DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-36-6-663
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Cozzi, Maria Strillacci, Paolo Valiati, Barbara Bighignoli, Mario Cancedda, Marta Zanotti

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,529,154
of 14,730,848 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#161
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,137
of 265,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,730,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them