↓ Skip to main content

The accuracy of several multiple sequence alignment programs for proteins

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
citeulike
18 CiteULike
connotea
9 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The accuracy of several multiple sequence alignment programs for proteins
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-7-471
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo AS Nuin, Zhouzhi Wang, Elisabeth RM Tillier

Abstract

There have been many algorithms and software programs implemented for the inference of multiple sequence alignments of protein and DNA sequences. The "true" alignment is usually unknown due to the incomplete knowledge of the evolutionary history of the sequences, making it difficult to gauge the relative accuracy of the programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Canada 5 2%
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 234 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 20%
Researcher 52 20%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 8%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 35 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 17%
Computer Science 25 10%
Chemistry 6 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 40 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,378,310
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,471
of 7,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,048
of 68,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.