You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scaling-up the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission in Mozambique (SAIA-SCALE): a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0889-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth Sherr, Kristjana Ásbjörnsdóttir, Jonny Crocker, Joana Coutinho, Maria de Fatima Cuembelo, Esperança Tavede, Nélia Manaca, Keshet Ronen, Felipe Murgorgo, Ruanne Barnabas, Grace John-Stewart, Sarah Holte, Bryan J. Weiner, James Pfeiffer, Sarah Gimbel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 47% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Malawi | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 249 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
| Researcher | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 87 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 90 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,307,927
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#711
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,728
of 349,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.