You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cost-effective and universal strategy for complete prokaryotic genomic sequencing proposed by computer simulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-5-80 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jingwei Jiang, Jun Li, Hoi Shan Kwan, Chun Hang Au, Patrick Tik Wan Law, Lei Li, Kai Man Kam, Julia Mei Lun Ling, Frederick C Leung |
| Abstract |
Pyrosequencing techniques allow scientists to perform prokaryotic genome sequencing to achieve the draft genomic sequences within a few days. However, the assemblies with shotgun sequencing are usually composed of hundreds of contigs. A further multiplex PCR procedure is needed to fill all the gaps and link contigs into complete chromosomal sequence, which is the basis for prokaryotic comparative genomic studies. In this article, we study various pyrosequencing strategies by simulated assembling from 100 prokaryotic genomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 43% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 65% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,230
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,005
of 4,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,944
of 247,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#66
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.