↓ Skip to main content

Neutrophils are a main source of circulating suPAR predicting outcome in critical illness

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neutrophils are a main source of circulating suPAR predicting outcome in critical illness
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40560-019-0381-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hendrik Gussen, Philipp Hohlstein, Matthias Bartneck, Klaudia Theresa Warzecha, Lukas Buendgens, Tom Luedde, Christian Trautwein, Alexander Koch, Frank Tacke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,204,262
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#353
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,210
of 348,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.