↓ Skip to main content

No evidence for spatial variation in predation risk following restricted-area fox culling

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
48 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No evidence for spatial variation in predation risk following restricted-area fox culling
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12898-019-0235-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jim-Lino Kämmerle, Sarah Niekrenz, Ilse Storch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 40%
Environmental Science 13 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,057,585
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#233
of 3,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,963
of 363,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.