↓ Skip to main content

Failed MitraClip therapy: surgical revision in high-risk patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failed MitraClip therapy: surgical revision in high-risk patients
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13019-019-0891-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabreen Mkalaluh, Marcin Szczechowicz, Matthias Karck, Alexander Weymann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#9,366,571
of 16,286,869 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#154
of 788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,701
of 272,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,286,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 788 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them