You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Comparison and extension of three methods for automated registration of multimodal plant images
Plant Methods, April 2019
Michael Henke, Astrid Junker, Kerstin Neumann, Thomas Altmann, Evgeny Gladilin
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||33%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||33%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||4||20%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||15%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||25%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||5%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 350,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.