You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of postoperative daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy on overall and local progression-free survival in patients with oral cavity cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-016-2165-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chen-Hsi Hsieh, Pei-Wei Shueng, Li-Ying Wang, Yu-Chuen Huang, Li-Jen Liao, Wu-Chia Lo, Yu-Chin Lin, Le-Jung Wu, Hui-Ju Tien |
| Abstract |
We compared the outcome of patients who received non-image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with those who received helical tomotherapy (HT), a daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), after surgery for oral cavity cancer (OCC). During the period November 2006 to December 2013, a total of 152 postoperative OCC patients underwent either IMRT (n = 79) or daily IGRT (n = 73) 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. Patients in the IMRT group received 6 MV photon beams to 7 fields and those in the IGRT group received daily fractions of 1.8 or 2 Gy on five consecutive days. Patients who received daily IGRT had higher 5-year overall survival than those who received IMRT (87 % versus 48 %, p = 0.015). The local progression-free survival rate was also higher in patients who received IGRT (85 % versus 58 %, p = 0.006). More patients in the IGRT group completed the package of overall treatment time in ≤ 13 weeks and completed their course of radiation therapy in ≤ 8 weeks than patients in the IMRT group (89 % versus 68 %, p = 0.002; 84 % versus 58 %, p = 0.001), respectively. The rate of local failure in the primary tumor area was 24.0 % in the IMRT group and 6.8 % in the IGRT group. Among patients with primary local failure, the marginal failure rate was 52.6 % in the IMRT group and 0 % in the IGRT group. For patients with locally advanced OCC, postoperative IGRT results in better overall survival, better local progression-free survival, less marginal failure and shorter overall treatment time than postoperative non-image-guided IMRT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,379,687
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,125
of 8,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,261
of 300,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#100
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,487 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.