↓ Skip to main content

Cardiotoxicity of anthracycline agents for the treatment of cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
587 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
462 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiotoxicity of anthracycline agents for the treatment of cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-10-337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lesley A Smith, Victoria R Cornelius, Christopher J Plummer, Gill Levitt, Mark Verrill, Peter Canney, Alison Jones

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 462 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 450 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 15%
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 11%
Student > Master 47 10%
Other 44 10%
Other 102 22%
Unknown 103 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 181 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 5%
Chemistry 17 4%
Other 43 9%
Unknown 119 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,361,255
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,115
of 8,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,788
of 93,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#48
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,314 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.