↓ Skip to main content

Dietary arachidonate in milk replacer triggers dual benefits of PGE2 signaling in LPS-challenged piglet alveolar macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary arachidonate in milk replacer triggers dual benefits of PGE2 signaling in LPS-challenged piglet alveolar macrophages
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40104-019-0321-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen R. Walter, Xi Lin, Sheila K. Jacobi, Tobias Käser, Debora Esposito, Jack Odle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,545,031
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#201
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,866
of 474,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.