You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol: Streamlined sub-protocols for floral-dip transformation and selection of transformants in Arabidopsis thaliana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-5-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda M Davis, Anthony Hall, Andrew J Millar, Chiarina Darrah, Seth J Davis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 409 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 105 | 24% |
| Researcher | 89 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 14% |
| Unknown | 57 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 281 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 67 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | <1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 68 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#209
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,909
of 108,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them