You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage of the “sugar tax” debate before and after the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6799-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christina H. Buckton, Gillian Fergie, Philip Leifeld, Shona Hilton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 31% |
United States | 4 | 9% |
Australia | 3 | 7% |
Ireland | 2 | 4% |
Mexico | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 42% |
Scientists | 18 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 229 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 10% |
Lecturer | 18 | 8% |
Researcher | 14 | 6% |
Other | 29 | 13% |
Unknown | 86 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 32 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 12 | 5% |
Other | 43 | 19% |
Unknown | 97 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#906,469
of 23,698,019 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#967
of 15,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,793
of 351,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#26
of 352 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,698,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 352 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.