↓ Skip to main content

Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
792 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
783 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2009
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-7-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Stewart-Brown, Alan Tennant, Ruth Tennant, Stephen Platt, Jane Parkinson, Scott Weich

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 783 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 13 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 762 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 120 15%
Researcher 103 13%
Student > Master 102 13%
Student > Bachelor 77 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 7%
Other 135 17%
Unknown 191 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 245 31%
Social Sciences 77 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 73 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 5%
Environmental Science 13 2%
Other 119 15%
Unknown 220 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#345
of 2,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,381
of 111,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.