↓ Skip to main content

A national study of plasma use in critical care: clinical indications, dose and effect on prothrombin time

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A national study of plasma use in critical care: clinical indications, dose and effect on prothrombin time
Published in
Critical Care, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon J Stanworth, Timothy S Walsh, Robin J Prescott, Robert J Lee, Douglas M Watson, Duncan Wyncoll, the Intensive Care Study of Coagulopathy (ISOC) investigators

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 108 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 15%
Other 17 14%
Student > Postgraduate 16 14%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 66%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,397
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,806
of 120,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#33
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.