You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative effectiveness of videotape and handout mode of instructions for teaching exercises: skill retention in normal children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pediatric Rheumatology, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1546-0096-10-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Garima Gupta, Stuti Sehgal |
Abstract |
Teaching of motor skills is fundamental to physical therapy practice. In order to optimize the benefits of these teaching and training efforts, various forms of patient education material are developed and handed out to patients. One very important fact has been overlooked. While comparative effectiveness of various modes of instruction has been studied in adults, attention has not been paid to the fact that learning capabilities of children are different from that of adults. The intent of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of video and handout mode of instructions specifically on children. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 21% |
Psychology | 11 | 17% |
Sports and Recreations | 10 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,801
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Rheumatology
#452
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,441
of 246,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Rheumatology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them