↓ Skip to main content

Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT)

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT)
Published in
Critical Care, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2423-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen A. Pfortmueller, Livia Faeh, Martin Müller, Balthasar Eberle, Hansjörg Jenni, Björn Zante, Josef Prazak, Lars Englberger, Jukka Takala, Stephan M. Jakob

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Unspecified 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 33 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 36%
Unspecified 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 40 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,044
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,458
of 363,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#98
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.