↓ Skip to main content

Biogeography and evolution of the Carassius auratus-complex in East Asia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biogeography and evolution of the Carassius auratus-complex in East Asia
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mikumi Takada, Katsunori Tachihara, Takeshi Kon, Gunji Yamamoto, Kei'ichiro Iguchi, Masaki Miya, Mutsumi Nishida

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#5,344,805
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,286
of 3,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,523
of 180,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#18
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.