↓ Skip to main content

Facts, values, and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): an update on the controversies

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facts, values, and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): an update on the controversies
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1753-2000-3-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Parens, Josephine Johnston

Abstract

The Hastings Center, a bioethics research institute, is holding a series of 5 workshops to examine the controversies surrounding the use of medication to treat emotional and behavioral disturbances in children. These workshops bring together clinicians, researchers, scholars, and advocates with diverse perspectives and from diverse fields. Our first commentary in CAPMH, which grew out of our first workshop, explained our method and explored the controversies in general. This commentary, which grows out of our second workshop, explains why informed people can disagree about ADHD diagnosis and treatment. Based on what workshop participants said and our understanding of the literature, we make 8 points. (1) The ADHD label is based on the interpretation of a heterogeneous set of symptoms that cause impairment. (2) Because symptoms and impairments are dimensional, there is an inevitable "zone of ambiguity," which reasonable people will interpret differently. (3) Many other variables, from different systems and tools of diagnosis to different parenting styles and expectations, also help explain why behaviors associated with ADHD can be interpreted differently. (4) Because people hold competing views about the proper goals of psychiatry and parenting, some people will be more, and others less, concerned about treating children in the zone of ambiguity. (5) To recognize that nature has written no bright line between impaired and unimpaired children, and that it is the responsibility of humans to choose who should receive a diagnosis, does not diminish the significance of ADHD. (6) Once ADHD is diagnosed, the facts surrounding the most effective treatment are complicated and incomplete; contrary to some popular wisdom, behavioral treatments, alone or in combination with low doses of medication, can be effective in the long-term reduction of core ADHD symptoms and at improving many aspects of overall functioning. (7) Especially when a child occupies the zone of ambiguity, different people will emphasize different values embedded in the pharmacological and behavioral approaches. (8) Truly informed decision-making requires that parents (and to the extent they are able, children) have some sense of the complicated and incomplete facts regarding the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 178 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Master 29 15%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 36 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 15%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 39 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,883,989
of 25,448,590 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#76
of 784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,969
of 185,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,448,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.