↓ Skip to main content

GLA:D® Back: group-based patient education integrated with exercises to support self-management of persistent back pain — feasibility of implementing standardised care by a course for clinicians

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GLA:D® Back: group-based patient education integrated with exercises to support self-management of persistent back pain — feasibility of implementing standardised care by a course for clinicians
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40814-019-0448-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice Kongsted, Jan Hartvigsen, Eleanor Boyle, Inge Ris, Per Kjaer, Line Thomassen, Werner Vach

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 27%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 14 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,150,843
of 15,621,958 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#55
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,829
of 268,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,621,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them