↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial direct-fed microbials fail to reduce methane emissions in primiparous lactating dairy cows

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacterial direct-fed microbials fail to reduce methane emissions in primiparous lactating dairy cows
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40104-019-0342-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeyamalar Jeyanathan, Cécile Martin, Maguy Eugène, Anne Ferlay, Milka Popova, Diego P. Morgavi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 26 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 31%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 9%
Unspecified 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 29 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,782,070
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#139
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,812
of 363,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.