↓ Skip to main content

"Enhanced" interrogation of detainees: do psychologists and psychiatrists participate?

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
"Enhanced" interrogation of detainees: do psychologists and psychiatrists participate?
Published in
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, September 2008
DOI 10.1186/1747-5341-3-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abraham L Halpern, John H Halpern, Sean B Doherty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 42 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Other 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Psychology 9 20%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,608,341
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#94
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,655
of 99,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.