You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patient safety in pre-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: a comprehensive meta-analysis of the intubation success rates of EMS providers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc11189 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hans Morten Lossius, Jo Røislien, David J Lockey |
Abstract |
Pre-hospital airway management is a controversial subject, but there is general agreement that a small number of seriously ill or injured patients require urgent emergency tracheal intubation (ETI) and ventilation. Many European emergency medical services (EMS) systems provide physicians to care for these patients while other systems rely on paramedics (or, rarely, nurses). The ETI success rate is an important measure of provider and EMS system success and a marker of patient safety. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 3 | 1% |
Canada | 3 | 1% |
Sweden | 2 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 1% |
Unknown | 197 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 48 | 22% |
Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
Other | 25 | 12% |
Researcher | 20 | 9% |
Lecturer | 13 | 6% |
Other | 50 | 23% |
Unknown | 31 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 61% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
Other | 15 | 7% |
Unknown | 36 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,572,992
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,156
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,428
of 255,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#21
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.