↓ Skip to main content

Sepsis 2016 Agra, India

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

23 tweeters


3 Dimensions

Readers on

9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Sepsis 2016 Agra, India
Published in
Critical Care, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1204-x
Pubmed ID

Surinder Kumar Sharma, Anurag Rohatgi, Mansi Bajaj, Charles L. Sprung, Ricardo Calderon Morales, Harvey Kasdan, Allon Reiter, Tobias Volker, Julien Meissonnier, Natalia Beloborodova, Viktor Moroz, Aleksandra Bedova, Yulia Sarshor, Artem Osipov, Katerina Chernevskaya, Nadezhda Fedotcheva, Ekaterina Chernevskaya, Hisashi Imahase, Kosuke C. Yamada, Yuichiro Sakamoto, Miho Ohta, Ryota Sakurai, Mayuko Yahata, Mitsuru Umeka, Toru Miike, Hiroyuki Koami, Futoshi Nagashima, Takashi Iwamura, Satoshi Inoue, Zhifeng Li, Dennis Grech, Patrick Morcillo, Alex Bekker, Luis Ulloa, Samanwoy Mukhopadhyay, Abhay D. Pandey, Samsiddhi Bhattacharjee, Saroj K. Mohapatra, Julie K. Wilson, Savita Jadhav, Rabindra Nath Misra, Nageswari Gandham, Kalpana Angadi, Chanda Vywahare, Neetu Gupta, Deepali Desai, Anahita Bakochi, Tirthankar Mohanty, Adam Linder, Johan Malmström, Dimple Anand, Seema Bhargava, Lalit Mohan Srivastava, Sumit Ray, Jane Fisher, Peter Bentzer, Luis Henrique Angenendt da Costa, Nilton Nascimentos dos Santos Júnior, Carlos Henrique Rocha Catalão, Maria José Alves da Rocha, Alfredo Focà, Cinzia Peronace, Giovanni Matera, Aida Giancotti, Giorgio Settimo Barreca, Angela Quirino, Maria Teresa Loria, Pio Settembre, Maria Carla Liberto, Bruno Amantea, Christiane Hartog, Claudia Moeller, Carolin Fleischmann, Daniel Thomas-Rueddel, Vlasislav Vlasakov, Bram Rochwerg, Philip Theurer, Konrad Reinhart, Anna E. Smith, Sandra D. Taylor, Christopher Da Costa, Amanda Radford, Terry Lee, Joel Singer, John Boyd, David Fineberg, Mark Williams, James A. Russell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Physics and Astronomy 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2016.
All research outputs
of 22,257,736 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
of 5,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 281,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,257,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.