↓ Skip to main content

Effect of multiple micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy on maternal and birth outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of multiple micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy on maternal and birth outcomes
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s3-s19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Batool Azra Haider, Mohammad Yawar Yakoob, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Abstract

Given the widespread prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies in developing countries, supplementation with multiple micronutrients rather than iron-folate alone, could be of potential benefit to the mother and the fetus. These benefits could relate to prevention of maternal complications and reduction in other adverse pregnancy outcomes such as small-for-gestational age (SGA) births, low birth weight, stillbirths, perinatal and neonatal mortality. This review evaluates the evidence of the impact of multiple micronutrient supplements during pregnancy, in comparison with standard iron-folate supplements, on specific maternal and pregnancy outcomes of relevance to the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). DATA SOURCES/REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials was conducted. Search engines used were PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the WHO regional databases and hand search of bibliographies. A standardized data abstraction and Child Health Epidemiology Reference (CHERG) adaptation of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) technique were used for data abstraction and overall quality of evidence. Meta-analyses were performed to calculate summary estimates of utility to the LiST model for the specified outcome of incidence of SGA births. We also evaluated the potential impact of multiple micronutrients on neonatal mortality according to the proportion of deliveries occurring in facilities (using a threshold of 60% to indicate functionality of health systems for skilled births).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 2 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 364 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 18%
Researcher 46 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Student > Postgraduate 31 8%
Other 71 19%
Unknown 69 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 8%
Social Sciences 27 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 75 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,099,180
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,571
of 15,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,120
of 111,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#34
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.