↓ Skip to main content

What's in a message? Delivering sexual health promotion to young people in Australia via text messaging

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
601 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What's in a message? Delivering sexual health promotion to young people in Australia via text messaging
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judy Gold, Megan SC Lim, Margaret E Hellard, Jane S Hocking, Louise Keogh

Abstract

Advances in communication technologies have dramatically changed how individuals access information and communicate. Recent studies have found that mobile phone text messages (SMS) can be used successfully for short-term behaviour change. However there is no published information examining the acceptability, utility and efficacy of different characteristics of health promotion SMS. This paper presents the results of evaluation focus groups among participants who received twelve sexual health related SMS as part of a study examining the impact of text messaging for sexual health promotion to on young people in Victoria, Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 601 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Pakistan 2 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 587 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 124 21%
Student > Bachelor 63 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 10%
Researcher 53 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 5%
Other 118 20%
Unknown 154 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 23%
Social Sciences 66 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 11%
Psychology 38 6%
Unspecified 16 3%
Other 104 17%
Unknown 171 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,777,561
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,963
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,231
of 180,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#10
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.