↓ Skip to main content

MetICA: independent component analysis for high-resolution mass-spectrometry based non-targeted metabolomics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MetICA: independent component analysis for high-resolution mass-spectrometry based non-targeted metabolomics
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-0970-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Youzhong Liu, Kirill Smirnov, Marianna Lucio, Régis D. Gougeon, Hervé Alexandre, Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin

Abstract

Interpreting non-targeted metabolomics data remains a challenging task. Signals from non-targeted metabolomics studies stem from a combination of biological causes, complex interactions between them and experimental bias/noise. The resulting data matrix usually contain huge number of variables and only few samples, and classical techniques using nonlinear mapping could result in computational complexity and overfitting. Independent Component Analysis (ICA) as a linear method could potentially bring more meaningful results than Principal Component Analysis (PCA). However, a major problem with most ICA algorithms is the output variations between different runs and the result of a single ICA run should be interpreted with reserve. ICA was applied to simulated and experimental mass spectrometry (MS)-based non-targeted metabolomics data, under the hypothesis that underlying sources are mutually independent. Inspired from the Icasso algorithm, a new ICA method, MetICA was developed to handle the instability of ICA on complex datasets. Like the original Icasso algorithm, MetICA evaluated the algorithmic and statistical reliability of ICA runs. In addition, MetICA suggests two ways to select the optimal number of model components and gives an order of interpretation for the components obtained. Correlating the components obtained with prior biological knowledge allows understanding how non-targeted metabolomics data reflect biological nature and technical phenomena. We could also extract mass signals related to this information. This novel approach provides meaningful components due to their independent nature. Furthermore, it provides an innovative concept on which to base model selection: that of optimizing the number of reliable components instead of trying to fit the data. The current version of MetICA is available at https://github.com/daniellyz/MetICA .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 58 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 32%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Computer Science 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,017,658
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,465
of 7,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,022
of 300,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#110
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.