↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of using photography for measuring knee range of motion: a methodological study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and reliability of using photography for measuring knee range of motion: a methodological study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justine M Naylor, Victoria Ko, Sam Adie, Clive Gaskin, Richard Walker, Ian A Harris, Rajat Mittal

Abstract

The clinimetric properties of knee goniometry are essential to appreciate in light of its extensive use in the orthopaedic and rehabilitative communities. Intra-observer reliability is thought to be satisfactory, but the validity and inter-rater reliability of knee goniometry often demonstrate unacceptable levels of variation. This study tests the validity and reliability of measuring knee range of motion using goniometry and photographic records.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 25%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Other 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 15%
Sports and Recreations 13 9%
Engineering 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,538
of 4,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,136
of 111,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.