You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Importance of radiolytic reactions during high-LET irradiation modalities: LET effect, role of O2 and radiosensitization by nanoparticles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Nanotechnology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12645-019-0047-y |
| Authors |
Gérard Baldacchino, Emilie Brun, Ibtihel Denden, Sarah Bouhadoun, Raphael Roux, Hicham Khodja, Cécile Sicard-Roselli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Researcher | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 16 | 27% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,573,450
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Nanotechnology
#66
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,581
of 352,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Nanotechnology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.