You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case-cohort design in practice – experiences from the MORGAM Project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-5573-4-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sangita Kulathinal, Juha Karvanen, Olli Saarela, Kari Kuulasmaa, the MORGAM Project |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 8% |
| Professor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 42% |
| Mathematics | 13 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations
#29
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,399
of 170,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.