↓ Skip to main content

Unusual duplication of the insulin-like receptor in the crustacean Daphnia pulex

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unusual duplication of the insulin-like receptor in the crustacean Daphnia pulex
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Boucher, Delphine Ditlecadet, Caroline Dubé, France Dufresne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 9 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 20%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,928
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,839
of 107,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#48
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.