You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Strategies for optimal calorie administration in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-019-0371-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomoaki Yatabe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 43 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 46 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,479,905
of 23,724,077 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#321
of 529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,784
of 352,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,724,077 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.