You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring overuse of continuous pulse oximetry in bronchiolitis and developing strategies for large-scale deimplementation: study protocol for a feasibility trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-019-0453-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irit R. Rasooly, Rinad S. Beidas, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Frances Barg, Christopher P. Landrigan, Amanda Schondelmeyer, Patrick W. Brady, Lisa M. McLeod, Christopher P. Bonafide |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 71% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,853,749
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#440
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,003
of 351,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.