You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Oral Health, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6831-14-62 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Melissa A Little, Pallav Pokhrel, Kelle L Murphy, Crissy T Kawamoto, Gil S Suguitan, Thaddeus A Herzog |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 28% |
Psychology | 6 | 13% |
Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,475,259
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#420
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,589
of 228,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.