↓ Skip to main content

Emerging concepts in biomarker discovery; The US-Japan workshop on immunological molecular markers in oncology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emerging concepts in biomarker discovery; The US-Japan workshop on immunological molecular markers in oncology
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2009
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-7-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideaki Tahara, Marimo Sato, Magdalena Thurin, Ena Wang, Lisa H Butterfield, Mary L Disis, Bernard A Fox, Peter P Lee, Samir N Khleif, Jon M Wigginton, Stefan Ambs, Yasunori Akutsu, Damien Chaussabel, Yuichiro Doki, Oleg Eremin, Wolf Hervé Fridman, Yoshihiko Hirohashi, Kohzoh Imai, James Jacobson, Masahisa Jinushi, Akira Kanamoto, Mohammed Kashani-Sabet, Kazunori Kato, Yutaka Kawakami, John M Kirkwood, Thomas O Kleen, Paul V Lehmann, Lance Liotta, Michael T Lotze, Michele Maio, Anatoli Malyguine, Giuseppe Masucci, Hisahiro Matsubara, Shawmarie Mayrand-Chung, Kiminori Nakamura, Hiroyoshi Nishikawa, A Karolina Palucka, Emanuel F Petricoin, Zoltan Pos, Antoni Ribas, Licia Rivoltini, Noriyuki Sato, Hiroshi Shiku, Craig L Slingluff, Howard Streicher, David F Stroncek, Hiroya Takeuchi, Minoru Toyota, Hisashi Wada, Xifeng Wu, Julia Wulfkuhle, Tomonori Yaguchi, Benjamin Zeskind, Yingdong Zhao, Mai-Britt Zocca, Francesco M Marincola

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
India 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 92 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Professor 11 11%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,283,299
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#557
of 4,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,704
of 110,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.