You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical aspects of the abuse of pharmaceutical enhancements by healthy people in the context of improving cognitive functions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13010-019-0076-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tina Tomažič, Anita Kovačič Čelofiga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#20,102,862
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#209
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,656
of 355,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.